CLast reviewed
Epigenetic clocks: measuring 'biological age'
Well-validated as age estimators; uncertain as proof that an intervention slows aging.

Editorial section. Research summaries are not product claims and contain no product links or offers. A summary is never proof that any product works.
- The question
- What do DNA methylation clocks measure, and can they judge a supplement?
- Study design
- Development of a multi-tissue DNA methylation age predictor from thousands of samples (2013). [1]
- What they found
- Methylation at 353 sites predicted chronological age accurately across most tissues. Later clocks were trained to predict health outcomes. [1]
- Limitations
- Consumer tests vary in reliability, and a lower score after an intervention is not proven to mean a longer or healthier life.
- What this does not mean
- We will not claim that any product lowers your biological age.
- Sources
- Horvath S. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Where it is discussed on podcasts
Verified episodes. Hosts and guests do not endorse Everstack. Podcast index
- Huberman Lab: Dr. Peter Attia: Supplements for Longevity & Their Efficacy (2024-07-29)
- The Peter Attia Drive: #175 Matt Kaeberlein, Ph.D.: The biology of aging, rapamycin, and other interventions that target the aging process (2021-09-13)
Spot an error? Email hello@everstackhealth.com and we will correct it within 48 hours.